#GIT MERGE MASTER INTO BRANCH VS REBASE UPDATE#

The commits on feature branch are stored in a temporary file and replayed onto master, you essentially rewrite your Git history with the new commits. The rebase Git command will replay all feature branches commits onto the tip of the master branch.

#GIT MERGE MASTER INTO BRANCH VS REBASE UPDATE#

Now, if you want to update your feature branch from the master without using the merge commit, then you could use rebasing. Let’s take the same example where you have created a feature branch meanwhile another developer has added new commits to the master branch. This three-way merge system develops a new commit to adopt the change. To resolve the issue, Git does have a three-way merge between the tips of the two branches and the last updated versions of those two branches. Now, to adopt this master branch change to your feature branch, you have to merge master into a feature because the master isn’t an ancestor of the last commit on the branch feature. Meanwhile you are doing all this, another developer working on the master branch decided that “This is a line” should be replaced with “This is a sentence” and commits this change. This new branch can be referred to as “More lines”. However, you aren’t satisfied here and thought of adding even more lines so you developed a new branch. But, later on you realize that you should add “This is a line” as the second commit. The basic difference between the work structure of the Git Merge and Rebase is: MergingĪssume you have developed an empty repo with a text file – “Hello World”. The working structure of both the git commands makes it harder for developers to pick the one solution.

The outcome of rebasing produces no extra commits and all the changes will be aligned up as feature branch commits are added right on the tip of the new master branch. Rebasing smoothly shift the feature branch to start on the tip of the master branch. Rebase command helps in integrating master branch changes to feature branch by tweaking the commit history in the desire to produce a straight and linear succession of commits. So, if you are opposing to merge commits in your feature branch history, then you might need to take a route of rebasing. However, there’s a tiny issue if your master branch is hypoactive, then this could pollute the history of your feature branch. With the single merge command, you will coil all the latest changes made in the master branch.

The merge is git command to let you adopt all the development changes incurred on the master branch and perfectly integrate them into the feature branch on which you have been working.

And, for that you have two options ahead of you - Git Merge or Git Rebase – on this note dev community divides. Now, here you might need to ascertain that you have the most updated master on your feature branch before creating a pull request. But, while you are finishing up your work on the features branch – one of your colleagues is making some changes to the master branch. If you are all set to develop a feature branch of a master branch to implement the new feature on which you have been working for ages.

Git merge master into branch vs rebase